I am tired of hearing former and current Major League Baseball players stating that the pitcher has to protect his team by hitting the other team's batter. It is absurd that grown men try to justify hitting a batter with a 90 mile per hour fastball in the middle of the back as part of the game.

If hitting a batter because he hits a home run and show boats a little, or the opposing pitcher brushed your player off the plate is so much part of the game, then why are some players ready to charge the mound? I know some people are going to say, but it is still not as dangerous as playing football. Yes, but there is a built in expectation of getting hit in football by opposing players. In baseball, collisions occurs when you are trying to steal a base or stretch a triple into a inside the park home run, not when you are at bat.

To me, a pitcher who hits a batter on purpose should not be mad if that player charges the mound and puts him on the dl. It is ludicrous when you watch a baseball game, to see an umpire give each team a warning for throwing at a batter. Talk about what we need to be teaching our children, the fundamentals of hitting a ball player, so your little league game can escalate into a brawl. Unfortunately, the only way most Major League Baseball players will agree with me, is for one of them to be paralyzed or end up in a grave, as a result of hitting a batter, because it is part of the game.

I am quite sure the game of baseball will survive if you do not hit batters on purpose. Besides a fastball in the back, arm, or neck stings very badly. As much as baseball players on average make, you would think they would never think of throwing at one another.

FSN Sports Baseball Articles

Sport Article Sections