Jason: We need to come with a suitable way of protecting the religious freedom of our citizens. I'm staying on the topic of protection of our citizens.

John: Let us first speak specifically concerning the right to worship, and I did read your earlier remarks.

Jason: The right to worship should be universal except where another human life is desecrated or endangered by any ritual or practice. So anything that is considered worship would fall within the scope of this reasoning.

John: Clever, however not as defined as it could be. Try this on for size, if you carry an 60 lb pound urn to the altar is it not true that your life is in danger, if you are not fit, yes or no?

Jason: Ok yes.

John: This is a more definitive definition for you to ponder. You have the right to worship except where a ritual or practice has a higher probability of death or serious harm, whether mental or physical injury is possible, protection under the laws is not guaranteed. However in some cases religious rites would be protected, for example, if your religion leads you to handle snakes, and it is an important part of a service or ritual it would be permitted, so long as that a reasonable person knows that this specific animal has not showed a propensity to harm humans, even if its species normally does. Children are protected by the state under such religious freedom laws, yet the parents will be held responsible if they are injured, thus holding the religion organization at no fault unless gross negligence occurs, applying a reasonable person standard.

Jason: That's a mouth full, but a very precise definition and allows for greater religious freedom. Two things that must be protected include the right to practice religion and freedom of speech. Let us continue to discuss this fundamental right.

Back to Building a Moral Society: Online Philosophy Book

Other Education Articles