Weapons of Mass Destruction Theory
By: Jason Cunningham
The case for removing Saddam
Hussein from power in Iraq centered around his
illegal possession of weapons of mass destruction. This would be a clear violation of UN
Sanctions imposed upon his nation, as a result of the Kuwait invasion of 1991.
Officials in the United States and around the world feared that the Iraq's
President would one day use these weapons against us or one of our allies
including Israel.
It was Secretary
of State Colin Powell who brilliantly laid the case for weapons of mass
destruction before the United Nations. This speech condemned Saddam as an
imminent threat to the world. In the State of Union Address, President Bush
insinuated that "Hussein tried to buy uranium from Niger for a nuclear program."
Unfortunately for the Bush administration no weapons of mass destruction have
been found so far in Iraq.
Yes attention has
been diverted from our initial reason for war, and the rhetoric has changed to
"now the world is a safer without Saddam," Bush seems to reiterate this often.
What happened to these so called weapons? Two different theories come to mind.
Maybe Saddam Hussein disarmed in an act to embarrass the United States. It is
befuddling why this is rarely or not at all mentioned. It is not like Saddam did
not have advance warning of the 2003 Iraq Occupation. If Hussein had any doubts
in his mind, they should have been cleared up during the March 2003 interview
with Dan Rather.
The more
dangerous theory that comes to mind is that these weapons of mass destructions
were stored in another country. Saddam probably could of got storage for
weapons from some other nation. Due to the already uneasiness towards United
States foreign policy surrounding the War in Iraq, we cannot accuse any country
of accepting weapons of mass destruction from Iraq without capturing them with
the goods in their hands and a positive dust for Saddam Hussein's fingerprints.
More Politics Articles